Jordan v. Wymore et al
| Travis Michael Jordan |
| David Campbell and Robert Wymore |
| 6:2021cv02007 |
| February 1, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Iowa |
| Judge Kelly KE Mahoney |
| CJ Williams |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER Dismissing Case. Signed by Clerk on 3/23/2021. (Mailed to plaintiff) (pac)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Dismissal Pursuant to Local Rule 41(c): Unless appropriate action is taken by 3/19/2021, this action will be dismissed. Signed by Clerk on 3/5/2021. (Attachments: #1 Local Rule 41) (Mailed to plaintiff) (pac) |
| Filing 3 PRO SE MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Travis Michael Jordan. (ksy)(NEF to Plf) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER re #1 Complaint filed by Travis Michael Jordan: The Court gives plaintiff 30 days from the date of this order to either pay the complete $402 filing fee or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court will give plaintiff 30 days from the date of this order to file an amended complaint. If plaintiff does not file an amended complaint or pay the fee or IFP within 30 days, this case will be dismissed with no further order of the Court. Signed by Judge CJ Williams on 2/3/2021. (order, 1983 and IFP forms mailed to Pltf) (jjh)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Iowa Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
