Alvarez-Victoriano v. City of Waterloo et al
Marcelino Alvarez-Victoriano |
City of Waterloo, C.J. Nichols and CJ Nichols |
6:2023cv02035 |
April 28, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Iowa |
Mark A Roberts |
Leonard T Strand |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 PROPOSED Scheduling Order and Discovery Plan by Plaintiff Marcelino Alvarez-Victoriano (Hamilton, Molly) |
Filing 5 PROPOSED Scheduling Order and Discovery Plan by Plaintiff Marcelino Alvarez-Victoriano (Hamilton, Molly) |
Filing 4 ANSWER With Jury Demand to Complaint by C.J. Nichols, City of Waterloo.(Gettman, Bruce) |
Filing 3 DOCKET Annotation re #1 Notice of Removal: Please see new civil case removal packet attached. (kms) |
Filing 2 STATE Court Petition With Jury Demand by Marcelino Alvarez-Victoriano. (kms) |
Chief Judge Leonard T Strand and Magistrate Judge Mark A Roberts added. No conflicts identified. (kms) |
Filing 1 NOTICE of Removal from Iowa District Court for Black Hawk County, case number CVCV147497. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AIANDC-3913034), filed by C.J. Nichols, City of Waterloo. Scheduling Report due by 6/27/2023 (Attachments: #1 State Court Pleadings, #2 LR 81 Statement, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (Gettman, Bruce) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Iowa Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.