Purcell v. Ameriserve International Inc. et al
| Megan Purcell |
| Dana Nielsen and Ameriserve International Inc. |
| 1:2024cv00024 |
| October 15, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Iowa |
| Helen C Adams |
| Stephen H Locher |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12111 Americans with Disabilities Act - Employment |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
TEXT ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Joshua Friedman; granting #3 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Shilpa Narayan. Signed by Magistrate Judge Helen C. Adams on 10/15/2024. (btg)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Receipt Number: AIASDC-5575792 Fee paid in the amount of $100. by Megan Purcell. (Newkirk, Thomas) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Receipt Number: AIASDC-5575780 Fee paid in the amount of $100. by Megan Purcell. (Newkirk, Thomas) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants Filing fee paid in the amount of $ 405, receipt number AIASDC-5575762., filed by Megan Purcell. Notice of Dismissal for lack of Service deadline set for 1/13/2025. Rule 16 Notice of Dismissal set for 1/13/2025. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit)(Newkirk, Thomas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Iowa Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
