Woodson v. Blevins et al
| Adam Woodson |
| RICHARD TYLER BLEVINS, jessica blevins and Ninja Holdings, LLC |
| 3:2022cv00068 |
| October 4, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Iowa |
| Rebecca Goodgame Ebinger |
| Stephen B Jackson |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 Copyright Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 REPORT REGARDING COPYRIGHT mailed to registrar. (Attachments: #1 Civil Complaint) (bp) |
| Filing 2 Summons/Corporate Disclosure Packet Note: Counsel should download the attached summons and/or corporate disclosure packet, if applicable. In compliance with Rule 4 of the Rules of Civil Procedure for summons and Local Rule 7.1 for the disclosure statements. (Attachments: #1 LR 7.1 Packet) (bp) |
| Filing 1 COPYRIGHT/PATENT/TRADEMARK COMPLAINT Woodson Blevins Ninja against All Defendants Filing fee paid in the amount of $ 402, receipt number AIASDC-4945331., filed by Adam Woodson. Notice of Dismissal for lack of Service deadline set for 1/2/2023. Rule 16 Notice of Dismissal set for 1/2/2023. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex A Blevins Woodson, #2 Exhibit Ex B Pon Pon, #3 Exhibit Ex C Pon Pon Registration, #4 Exhibit Ex D Pon Pon Merchandise, #5 Exhibit Ex E Blevin Pon Pon)(Hamilton, Jay) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Iowa Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
