Morgan v. Sundance, Inc.
| Robyn Morgan |
| Sundance, Inc. |
| 4:2018cv00316 |
| September 25, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Iowa |
| Helen C Adams |
| John A Jarvey |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 21, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 RESPONSE to Motion re #9 MOTION to Dismiss or, Alternatively Stay filed by Robyn Morgan. Replies due by 11/28/2018. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Fiedler, Paige) |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss or, Alternatively Stay by Sundance, Inc.. Responses due by 11/23/2018. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Exhibit A - Complaint, #3 Exhibit B - Flanagan Amended Complaint, #4 Exhibit C - Stipulated Order, #5 Appendix Unpublished Case Law)(Rice, Joel) |
| Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure/Statement of Interest by Sundance, Inc.. (Rice, Joel) |
| Filing 7 TEXT ORDER granting #5 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Joel W. Rice; granting #6 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Scott C. Fanning. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Helen C. Adams on 10/30/2018. (kjw) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Receipt Number: 0863-3635759 Fee paid in the amount of $100. by Sundance, Inc.. (Fanning, Scott) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Receipt Number: 0863-3635753 Fee paid in the amount of $100. by Sundance, Inc.. (Rice, Joel) |
| Filing 4 TEXT ORDER: ORDER granting #3 defendant Sundance, Inc.'s unopposed motion for an extension of time to answer or otherwise plead to plaintiff's complaint. Defendant shall have until 11/8/2018 to move or plead in response to the complaint. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Helen C. Adams on 10/18/2018.(kln) |
| Filing 3 Unresisted MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, or Otherwise Plead to Plaintiff's Complaint by Sundance, Inc..Motions referred to Helen C. Adams. (Driscoll, Kevin) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Robyn Morgan. Sundance, Inc. served on 9/27/2018, answer due 10/18/2018. (Fiedler, Paige) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT and Jury Demand against Sundance, Inc.,Filing fee paid in the amount of $400, receipt number 0863-3605766 filed by Robyn Morgan. Notice of Dismissal for lack of Service deadline set for 12/24/2018. Rule 16 Notice of Dismissal set for 12/24/2018.(Fiedler, Paige) Modified on 9/25/2018, added payment information (kjw). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Iowa Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Morgan v. Sundance, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Sundance, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Joel W. Rice |
| Represented By: | Scott C. Fanning |
| Represented By: | Kevin J Driscoll |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Robyn Morgan | |
| Represented By: | Paige Ellen Fiedler |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
