Larson v. Des Moines Police Department et al
| Richard Larson, Jr. |
| Bobby Tagoa, Robinson, Selena Gomez, Des Moines Police Department, Sean McCarthy, Ella Marija Lani Yelich-O'Connor, Eric Doe, Mike Hutchison and Mercy One |
| 4:2021cv00003 |
| January 6, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Iowa |
| Celeste F Bremer |
| Stephanie M Rose |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 JUDGMENT in favor of Des Moines Police Department, Mercy One, Robinson, Bobby Tagoa, Ella Marija Lani Yelich-O'Connor, Eric Doe, Mike Hutchison, Sean McCarthy, Selena Gomez against Richard Larson, Jr. Signed by Clerk John S. Courter on 1/22/2021. (kmc) |
Filing 3
ORDER denying #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and dismissing case under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e) for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. A copy of this Order was mailed to Plaintiff by Chambers. Signed by Judge Stephanie M. Rose on 1/21/2021. (NDC)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Richard Larson, Jr. (kjw) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Richard Larson, Jr. Notice of Dismissal for lack of Service deadline set for 4/6/2021. Rule 16 Notice of Dismissal set for 4/6/2021. (kjw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Iowa Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
