Gamadid et al v. United States Department of State et al
Ikran Gamadid, Ismail Yussuf Maalim and Ikran Dayib Gamadid |
Department of State, Monty Wilkinson, Christopher Wray, Anthony Blinken, Federal Bureau of Investigation, United States of America and United States Department of State |
4:2021cv00035 |
February 5, 2021 |
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Iowa |
Helen C Adams |
John A Jarvey |
Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 TEXT ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Heather Kryzak. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Helen C. Adams on 2/10/2021. (kjw) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Receipt Number: 0863-4392441 Fee paid in the amount of $100. by Ikran Dayib Gamadid, Ismail Yussuf Maalim. (Kryzak, Heather) |
Filing 2 Summons Note: Counsel should download the attached summons in compliance with Rule 4 of the Rules of Civil Procedure. (kjw) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Mandamus Filing fee paid in the amount of $ 402, receipt number IAS400023402., filed by Ismail Yussuf Maalim, Ikran Dayib Gamadid. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F)(Keller, Michael) Modified on 2/9/2021 updated receipt number (don). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Iowa Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.