Dz Bank AG Deutsche Zentral-Genossenschaftsbank v. Adam Peters Agency, Inc. et al
| Dz Bank AG Deutsche Zentral-Genossenschaftsbank |
| Adam Peters Agency, Inc., Renate Aldridge, All General Lines Insurance, LLC, Esmeralda Casimiro, CSB Incorporated, Jolene Deges, Eagle Security and Guaranty LLC, Ricardo M. Gutierrez, H&K Insurance, Inc., Hamill & Hamill Insurance Agency, LLC, Christine Galindo Lamas, Dan Madeley, Nick Hammer Agency, Inc., Lynne Oakley, R & S Insurance, LLC, Lionel Sanabria, Save On Michigan Insurance Agency, Inc., Janie Evette Serrato, Universe Financial Agency, Inc., The, Wallace Agency, L.L.C., The and Diane Williams |
| 2:2010cv02126 |
| March 4, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Kansas City Office |
| XX Outside US |
| James P. O'Hara |
| Julie A. Robinson |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Contract Default |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
147
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that no changes are necessary to the court's order granting summary judgment against defendant Williams. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no changes are necessary to the court's entry of judgment against defendant Williams. Signed by District Judge Carlos Murguia on 7/26/2013. Mailed to pro se party Diane Williams by regular mail. (kao)
|
|
Filing
141
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Defendant Williams has shown good cause as to the court's show cause orders (Docs. 127 and 137) and her letters and documents shall be filed following this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiff and defendant Wil liams are to file briefs discussing how the letters and documents filed by defendant Williams affect the court's order granting summary judgment (Doc. 133) and entry of judgment in favor of plaintiff (Doc. 135). Each brief is limited to five pag es and is due on or before July 12, 2013. After reviewing the briefs, the court will assess any necessary changes to its order granting summary judgment and entry of judgment. See Order for further details. Signed by District Judge Carlos Murguia on 6/27/2013. Mailed to pro se party Diane Williams by certified mail. (Certified Tracking Number: 7002 2030 0000 9348 7155)(kao)
|
|
Filing
134
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 124 Motion to Reinstate as to Janie Serrato and for Entry of Judgment Against Janie Serrato. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff is entitled to entry of judgment against defendant Serrato in the principal amount of $190,151.98, plus interest in the amount of $2,289.41 and attorneys' fees in the amount of $1,620.00, less payments made in accordance with the Settlement Agreement of $2,200.00, for a total judgment amount of $191,861.39. Signed by District Judge Carlos Murguia on 3/20/2013. Mailed to pro se party Janie Serrato by regular mail. (kao)
|
|
Filing
67
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 55 Plaintiff DZ Bank's Motion to Strike Defendants' Affirmative Defenses 1-8 and 11-12 as Barred by the Doctrine of Claim Preclusion or, in the Alternative, for Partial Judgment on the Pleadings. Signed by District Judge Carlos Murguia on 6/28/2011. (jw)
|
|
Filing
44
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER dismissing claims against defendant Ricardo M. Gutierrez without prejudice. Signed by District Judge Julie A. Robinson on 11/17/10.(pp)
|
|
Filing
41
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 22 Motion for Leave to File Surreply; denying 9 Motion to Change Venue. Signed by District Judge Julie A. Robinson on 11/10/10. (pp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
