Sloan v. Renzenberger, Inc. et al
| Johnnyette Sloan |
| Renzenberger, Inc. and Peterson Manufacturing Company |
| 2:2010cv02508 |
| September 21, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Kansas City Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Carlos Murguia |
| James P. O'Hara |
| Fair Labor Standards Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
119
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 118 the parties' Renewed Joint Motion to Approve Settlement Agreements and Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties are directed to promptly file a stipulation of dismissal, at which time the court will dismiss the action with prejudice, each party to bear his, her or its own costs. Signed by District Judge Carlos Murguia on 10/27/2011. (jw)
|
|
Filing
117
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying without prejudice 116 Joint Motion to Approve Settlement Agreements and Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that on or before October 28, 2011, the parties may file a renewed motion to approve settlement in accord with the foregoing order. Signed by District Judge Carlos Murguia on 10/13/2011. (jw)
|
|
Filing
47
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 35 Plaintiff's Motion for Conditional Certification of Class Claims under Section 216(b) of the FLSA as set forth in the Memorandum and Order. See Memorandum and Order for further details. Signed by District Judge Carlos Murguia on 4/15/2011. (jw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
