Griffin et al v. Home Depot USA, Inc.
Karen Griffin, Shyla Case, Barbara Hindman, Margaret Moore, Vicky Stevans and Mark Panichello |
Home Depot USA, Inc. |
2:2011cv02366 |
June 29, 2011 |
US District Court for the District of Kansas |
Kansas City Office |
Leavenworth |
Richard D. Rogers |
K. Gary Sebelius |
Employment |
29 U.S.C. ยง 621 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 72 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER generally denying 49 Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel. Defendant shall supplement its prior production and responses to include the additional time period of January through March 2011. The parties are also directed to meet and confer regarding the use of metadata and the form of production of ESI. If an agreement cannot be reached regarding the production of ESI, the parties can seek relief from the Court by filing the appropriate motion within twenty-one (21) days of the filing of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge K. Gary Sebelius on 3/28/2013. (mrb) |
Filing 15 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 7 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction/ Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. The court shall grant defendant's motion to dismiss as to plaintiff's disparate impac t claim. This caim shall be dismissed without prejudice. The court shall also dismiss the claims of plaintiff Panichello without prejudice. Otherwise, defendant's mtion to dismiss shall be denied. Signed by District Judge Richard D. Rogers on 1/9/2012. (meh) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.