Select Brands, Inc. v. Sensio, Inc.
Plaintiff: Select Brands, Inc.
Defendant: Sensio, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2013cv02108
Filed: March 1, 2013
Court: US District Court for the District of Kansas
Office: Kansas City Office
County: Johnson
Presiding Judge: Gerald L. Rushfelt
Presiding Judge: Kathryn H. Vratil
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 27, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 27 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re 14 Motion to Stay Pending Inter Partes Review. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gerald L. Rushfelt on 9/27/2013. (mh)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Select Brands, Inc. v. Sensio, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Select Brands, Inc.
Represented By: Matthew B. Walters
Represented By: Michael Elbein
Represented By: Scott R. Brown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sensio, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?