Camick v. Wattley et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|April 4, 2014
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER stating that Plaintiff's Motion to Withdraw Motion for Extension of Time to File a Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment 57 is granted and his Motion for Extension of Time to File a Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment 45 is wi thdrawn. Plaintiff's Motion to Stay Order Awarding Costs 46 and Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending Disposition of US v. Camick 49 are denied as moot. Plaintiff's Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment 47 , Amended Motion to Alter or Amend J udgment 56 , and Motions to Appoint Counsel, Documents 50 , 59 , and 61 are denied. Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis 58 is denied without prejudice to refiling as a motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis along with an amended Financial Affidavit. Signed by District Judge Julie A. Robinson on 4/4/2014. Mailed to pro se party Leslie Lyle Camick by regular mail. (ms)
|December 5, 2013
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting Motions to Dismiss 14 17 19 24 . Defendant District Court of Cowley County is dismissed without prejudice. Defendants Wattley, KaiTraxx, Smith, Hills, and the Winfield Police Department are dismissed with prej udice. Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment 37 is denied. Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Defendant District Court of Cowley County's Motion to Stay Discovery 36 is moot. Signed by District Judge Julie A. Robinson on 12/5/2013. Mailed to pro se party Leslie Lyle Camick by regular mail. (ms)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?