Caravan Ingredients v. Azo, Inc. et al
| Caravan Ingredients, Inc. |
| Azo, Inc. and Sefar, Inc. |
| 2:2013cv02592 |
| November 19, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Kansas City Office |
| Wyandotte |
| J. Thomas Marten |
| James P. O'Hara |
| Tort Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
145
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 122 plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 124 plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 126 defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 129 plaintiff's Motion to Strike ; denying 132 defendant's Motion to Strike ; granting 141 defendant's Motion for Leave to File; and denying 142 plaintiff's Motion to Strike. Signed by Chief Judge J. Thomas Marten on 4/24/15. (mss)
|
|
Filing
131
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 86 plaintiff's Motion in Limine; denying 99 defendant's Motion for Reconsideration; denying 104 plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment; and denying as moot 118 defendant's Motion to Strike. Signed by Chief Judge J. Thomas Marten on 3/20/15. (mss)
|
|
Filing
93
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 64 plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; and denying 91 defendant's Motion for Extension of Time to File Surreply. Signed by Chief Judge J. Thomas Marten on 12/16/14. (mss)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
