Ezfauxdecor, LLC et al v. Smith et al
Ezfauxdecor, LLC and Amber Shank |
Alison Smith, Appliance Art Incorporated, Instant One Media, Inc. and Easy Home Renewals |
2:2015cv09140 |
June 25, 2015 |
US District Court for the District of Kansas |
Kansas City Office |
Johnson |
Kenneth G. Gale |
Carlos Murguia |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 138 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 126 Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kenneth G. Gale on 6/23/17. (df) |
Filing 135 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 119 Motion Regarding ESI Protocol; granting in part and denying in part 122 Second Motion to Adopt ESI Protocol. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kenneth G. Gale on 6/16/17. (df) |
Filing 104 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 81 Motion for Protective Order; granting 83 Motion for Protective Order; granting in part and denying in part 87 Motion for ESI protocol; granting in part and denying in part 88 Motion for ESI protocol; granting 98 Motion for Extension of Time to File Discovery Motion. The Court will enter the Protective Order as a separate entry in the Court's docketing system. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kenneth G. Gale on 3/6/17. (df) |
Filing 101 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 63 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Signed by District Judge Carlos Murguia on 2/17/17. (hw) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.