Pierce v. Ferrell et al
| Justin Pierce |
| James E. Ferrell, Alan C. Heitmann, Stephen L. Wambold, Ferrellgas, Inc. and Ferrellgas Partners, L.P. |
| 2:2017cv02160 |
| March 16, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Kansas City Office |
| Allen |
| Gwynne E. Birzer |
| John W. Lungstrum |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
15
MEMROANDUM AND ORDER re 11 Stipulation of Dismissal filed by Justin Pierce - The parties have not shown that there is no risk of prejudice if this case is dismissed without notice to the shareholders, and there may be alternative means that woul d allow notice to be given at minimal cost. Therefore, the Court will not approve dismissal of the case at this stage without the notice required by Rule 23.1(c). The parties are ordered to confer and to file a joint proposed notice plan with the C ourt by October 4, 2019. That plan should include the content of the notice, the methods of providing the notice, and dates of the intervention period. If the parties cannot agree on all details of the notice plan, they shall note any such disagreements in their joint filing. The Court will then approve or require revision of the plan submitted by the parties. If no shareholder moves to intervene within the designated time period, the Court will approval dismissal of the action. Signed by District Judge John W. Lungstrum on 09/12/2019. (ses)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
