Roudybush v. Mitchell et al
| John Roudybush |
| Ellen Mitchell, William B. Elliot, Richard A. Buck, Steve Marten and Melvin Ray Lagerman |
| 2:2017cv02421 |
| July 21, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Kansas City Office |
| Mitchell |
| Kenneth G. Gale |
| Carlos Murguia |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
13
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER adopting 6 Report and Recommendations.; granting in part and denying in part 8 Motion for Order; granting the request fir review and denying the relief that plaintiff seeks. 9 Motion for Reconsideration ; granting 11 Motion for Extension of Time to File.; granting 12 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply. The court dismisses plaintiff's complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and failure to state a claim.The case is closed. Mailed to pro-se John Roudybush by certified mail. Certified tracking number 70123460000082626344 Signed by District Judge Carlos Murguia on 10/19/2017. (ydm)
|
|
Filing
5
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; denying 4 Motion to Appoint Counsel. This Order also serves as the REPORT & RECOMMENDATION of DISMISSAL to the District Court of Plaintiff's Complaint 1 . The document is included in the Court's electronic filing system as two entries for docketing/tracking purposes. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kenneth G. Gale on 8/3/17. (df)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
