Calton v. JVM Sovereign Apartments, LLC
| John Calton |
| JVM Sovereign Apartments, LLC |
| Davis Development, Inc., Morrow Construction Company, Inc. and Bull Outdoor Products, Inc. |
| JVM Sovereign Apartments, LLC |
| 2:2017cv02739 |
| December 29, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Kansas City Office |
| Johnson |
| Daniel D. Crabtree |
| James P. O'Hara |
| Personal Injury- Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
61
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED BY THE COURT THAT this case is remanded to Johnson County, Kansas District Court for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The court directs the Clerk of Court to take all necessary steps to effectuate this remand. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT JVM's original Third-Party Complaint (Doc. 8) is remanded as part of the case, but its Amended Third-Party Complaint (Doc. 31) is not. Signed by District Judge Daniel D. Crabtree on 8/2/18. (hw)
|
|
Filing
43
NOTICE AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. The court orders JVM Sovereign Apartments, LLC to show cause why the claims against Creative Stucco & Stone, Inc. should not be dismissed, with prejudice, for lack of prosecution under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Show Cause Response due by 6/29/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara on 06/19/2018. (tvn)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
