Jones v. Kansas State Board of Nursing et al
| Crystal Nicole Jones |
| Kansas State Board of Nursing, Bryce D. Benedict, Judith Hiner, Carol Bragdon and Mary Blubaugh |
| 2:2018cv02175 |
| April 12, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Kansas City Office |
| Sedgwick |
| Kenneth G. Gale |
| Julie A Robinson |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
11
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED BY THE COURT that Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed with Trial and Memorandum (Doc. 7 ) is denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED BY THE COURT that Plaintiff's Objection and Memorandum to Recommendation fo r Dismissal (Doc. 8 ) is overruled. The Court adopts Magistrate Judge Kenneth Gale's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 6 ) and dismisses Plaintiff's Complaint with prejudice. Signed by Chief District Judge Julie A Robinson on 8/6/2018. Mailed to pro se party Crystal Nicole Jones by regular mail. (hl)
|
|
Filing
5
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; denying 4 Motion to Appoint Counsel. The Court notes that this document also serves as the Report & Recommendation of Dismissal to the District Court. It appears on the Court's electronic docketing system as two documents for administrative/tracking purposes. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kenneth G. Gale on 5/2/18. Mailed to pro se party Crystal Nicole Jones by certified mail. (df)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
