Michael et al v United States of America
| Kathleen Michael and Danny Ray Michael |
| United States of America |
| 2:2018cv02559 |
| October 18, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Daniel D Crabtree |
| Teresa J James |
| Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2671 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 3, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Summons Returned Executed - served by Certified Mail on 10/25/2018 Summons served on United States Attorney General. (Crow, Michael). |
| Filing 3 Summons Returned Executed - served by Certified Mail on 10/22/2018 United States of America served on 10/22/2018, answer due 12/21/2018. Summons served on United States Attorney. (Crow, Michael) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Plaintiffs Danny Ray Michael, Kathleen Michael. (Crow, Michael) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with trial location of Kansas City ( Filing fee $400, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-4611497.), filed by Danny Ray Michael.(Crow, Michael) |
| NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to District Judge Daniel D. Crabtree and Magistrate Judge Teresa J. James for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (ca) |
| SUMMONS ISSUED as to U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (issued to Attorney for service).(ca) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
