Maupin v. Senior Lifestyle Corporation
| Darlene Maupin |
| Senior Lifestyle Corporation |
| 2:2019cv02215 |
| May 3, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Gwynne E Birzer |
| Daniel D Crabtree |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 1, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
INITIAL ORDER REGARDING PLANNING AND SCHEDULING: Scheduling Conference set for 9/5/2019 at 10:00 AM by telephone before Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer. Participants shall dial into the conference call at 888-363-4749, enter access code 9686294#, and follow the prompts to join the call. Report of Parties Planning Conference and Rule 26 Initial Disclosures due 8/29/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer on 7/1/19. (alm)
|
| Filing 8 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Senior Lifestyle Corporation . (Ballew, Gregory) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint by Senior Lifestyle Corporation.(Ballew, Gregory) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER granting #5 Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Senior Lifestyle Corporation answer due 6/24/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer on 6/20/19. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (alm)
|
| Filing 5 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Defendant Senior Lifestyle Corporation (referred to Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer) (Ballew, Gregory) |
| Filing 4 CLERKS ORDER EXTENDING TIME until 6/17/19 for Defendant Senior Lifestyle Corporation to answer or otherwise plead. Signed by deputy clerk on 5/30/19. (hw) |
| Filing 3 d/b/a Sheridan at Overland Park SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED -- Certified Mail by Darlene Maupin upon Senior Lifestyle Corporation served on 5/11/2019, answer due 6/3/2019 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A to Proof of Service)(Doyle, Daniel) |
| SUMMONS ISSUED as to Senior Lifestyle Corporation. (issued to Attorney for service) (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry) (ca) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Plaintiff Darlene Maupin. (Doyle, Daniel) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with trial location of Kansas City ( Filing fee $400, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-4796590.), filed by Darlene Maupin.(Doyle, Daniel) |
| NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to District Judge Daniel D. Crabtree and Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (ca) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Maupin v. Senior Lifestyle Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Darlene Maupin | |
| Represented By: | Daniel L. Doyle |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Senior Lifestyle Corporation | |
| Represented By: | Gregory D. Ballew |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
