Williams v. Lineage Logistics, LLC
| Racine Williams |
| Lineage Logistics, LLC |
| 2:2019cv02460 |
| August 9, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Gwynne E Birzer |
| Daniel D Crabtree |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 13, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #4 Joint Motion to Stay Case. This lawsuit is stayed pending the parties' submission of this case to arbitration and the outcome of the arbitration proceeding. However, the Court orders the parties to submit periodic reports on the status of arbitration. Such a status report is due 12/12/19. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer on 9/13/19. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (adc)
|
| Filing 4 Joint MOTION to Stay Case Pending Arbitration by Defendant Lineage Logistics, LLC (referred to Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Agreement)(Boatright, Daniel) |
| SUMMONS ISSUED as to Lineage Logistics, LLC. (issued to Attorney for service) (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry) (ca) |
| Filing 3 DOCKET ANNOTATION: A redacted version of #1 Complaint - Exhibit 1 has been added to the entry and is attached to this annotation for noticing purposes ONLY (hw) |
| NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY - Document is not redacted properly. The filing party/attorney is directed to correct the deficiency immediately.(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (hw) |
| NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to District Judge Daniel D. Crabtree and Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (hw) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Plaintiff Racine Williams. (Rickley, Kathryn) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with trial location of Kansas City ( Filing fee $400, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-4888467.), filed by Racine Williams. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit EEOC Charge, #2 Exhibit Right to Sue)(Rickley, Kathryn) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/12/2019: #3 Exhibit EEOC Charge - Redacted) (hw). Modified on 8/12/2019 to add redacted version of Exhibit 1. Original contained personal information and is blocked from public view (hw). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Williams v. Lineage Logistics, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Racine Williams | |
| Represented By: | Kathryn J. Starrett Rickley |
| Represented By: | Matthew Edward Osman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Lineage Logistics, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Daniel B. Boatright |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
