Turina v. Sprint Corporation
Plaintiff: Kristina Turina
Defendant: Sprint/United Management Company and Sprint Corporation
Case Number: 2:2020cv02018
Filed: January 10, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Kansas
Presiding Judge: Teresa J James
Referring Judge: Kathryn H Vratil
Nature of Suit: Labor: Other
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 206
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 18, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER granting #8 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Jolie Noelle Pavlos and C. Ryan Morgan for Kristina Turina pursuant to D. Kan. Rule 83.5.4 for purposes of this case only. Unless already registered, pro hac vice counsel should register for electronic notification pursuant to the court's Administrative Procedures by completing a CM/ECF Electronic Filing Registration Form at http://www.ksd.uscourts.gov. Signed by Magistrate Judge Teresa J. James on 2/18/2020. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (hw)
February 14, 2020 Filing 9 (DISREGARD ENTRY - FILED IN ERROR; Document is the proposed order regarding docket entry # 8 and should have been emailed to chambers.) MOTION for Order to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Plaintiff Kristina Turina (referred to Magistrate Judge Teresa J. James) (Krisztal, Ruben) Modified on 2/17/2020 to block from public view. (kao)
February 14, 2020 Filing 8 MOTION for attorney Jolie Pavlos, Ryan Morgan to appear pro hac vice ( Pro hac vice fee $100, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-5061805.) by Plaintiff Kristina Turina (referred to Magistrate Judge Teresa J. James) (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Krisztal, Ruben)
February 11, 2020 Filing 7 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE by Robert Julio Rojas on behalf of All Defendants. (Rojas, Robert)
February 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER granting #5 Defendants' Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Amended Class Action Complaint. Defendants Sprint Corporation and Sprint/United Management Company are hereby granted an extension of time, to and including March 31, 2020, in which to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's #2 Amended Class Action Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Teresa J. James on 2/10/2020. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (ts)
February 10, 2020 Filing 5 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #2 Amended Complaint by Defendants Sprint Corporation, Sprint/United Management Company (referred to Magistrate Judge Teresa J. James) (Summers, Curtis)
January 29, 2020 Filing 4 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED -- Personal Service by Kristina Turina upon Sprint Corporation served on 1/24/2020, answer due 2/14/2020; Sprint/United Management Company served on 1/24/2020, answer due 2/14/2020 (Krisztal, Ruben)
January 23, 2020 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Sprint Corporation, Sprint/United Management Company. (issued to Attorney for service) (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry) (ca)
January 15, 2020 Filing 3 DESIGNATION OF PLACE OF TRIAL filed by Plaintiff Kristina Turina - trial to be held in Kansas City. (Krisztal, Ruben)
January 13, 2020 Filing 2 AMENDED COMPLAINT with Exhibit against Sprint Corporation, Sprint/United Management Company, filed by Kristina Turina. (Attachments: #1 Ex A)(Krisztal, Ruben)
January 13, 2020 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Sprint Corporation, Sprint/United Management Company. (issued to Attorney for service) (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry) (ca)
January 10, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with trial location of Kansas City ( Filing fee $400, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-5026829.), filed by Kristina Turina. (Attachments: #1 Ex. A)(Krisztal, Ruben)
January 10, 2020 NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to District Judge Kathryn H. Vratil and Magistrate Judge Teresa J. James for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (ca)
January 10, 2020 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY - Designation of place of trial is missing. The filing party/attorney is directed to correct the deficiency immediately.(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (ca)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Turina v. Sprint Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kristina Turina
Represented By: Ruben J. Krisztal
Represented By: C. Ryan Morgan
Represented By: Jolie Noelle Pavlos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sprint/United Management Company
Represented By: Robert Julio Rojas
Represented By: Curtis R. Summers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sprint Corporation
Represented By: Robert Julio Rojas
Represented By: Curtis R. Summers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?