Ramirez-Gonzalez v. USA
Petitioner: Juan Carlos Ramirez-Gonzalez
Respondent: USA
Case Number: 2:2020cv02476
Filed: September 25, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Kansas
Presiding Judge: Daniel D Crabtree
Referring Judge: James P O'Hara
2 Judge: Julie A Robinson
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 19, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER granting #5 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Harvey A. Steinberg for Juan Carlos Ramirez-Gonzalez pursuant to D. Kan. Rule 83.5.4 for purposes of this case only. Signed by Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara on 11/19/2020. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (ca)
November 18, 2020 Filing 5 MOTION for attorney Harvey A. Steinberg to appear pro hac vice ( Pro hac vice fee $50, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-5326433.) by Petitioner Juan Carlos Ramirez-Gonzalez (referred to Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara) (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Declaration of Harvey Steinberg, #2 ECF Registration Form Registration Form)(Robinson, Edward)
November 18, 2020 Filing 4 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE by Edward L. Robinson on behalf of Juan Carlos Ramirez-Gonzalez. (Robinson, Edward)
October 9, 2020 Filing 3 PRELIMINARY PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE ORDER. Signed by Chief District Judge Julie A. Robinson and Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara on 8/23/19. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(kao)
October 9, 2020 Filing 2 AMENDED MOTION to Vacate/Set Aside/Correct Sentence. This entry is a duplicate of the entry that was made in criminal case number 16-20016-4; the motion was refiled in the civil case for reference purposes. Response deadline 10/23/2020. (Attachments: #1 Thomason Affidavit) (kao)
October 9, 2020 MINUTE ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Chief District Judge Julie A. Robinson and Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara for all further proceedings as this case relates to Case. No. 19-2491, in re: CCA Recordings 2255 Litigation. District Judge Daniel D. Crabtree no longer assigned to case. Signed by deputy clerk on 10/9/20. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.)(kao)
September 28, 2020 (DISREGARD ENTRY) DOCKET ANNOTATION: Do Not File in this case; All filings to be made in 2:20-cr-20016-JAR-JPO-1 ONLY. (heo) Modified on 10/9/2020 (kao).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ramirez-Gonzalez v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: USA
Represented By: Tristram W. Hunt
Represented By: Scott C. Rask
Represented By: Annette B. Gurney
Represented By: James A. Brown
Represented By: Duston J. Slinkard
Represented By: Carrie Nicole Capwell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Juan Carlos Ramirez-Gonzalez
Represented By: Harvey A. Steinberg
Represented By: Lydia Krebs
Represented By: Melody J. Brannon
Represented By: Edward L. Robinson
Represented By: Kirk C. Redmond
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?