Hood v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
| Jeremy Hood |
| Union Pacific Railroad Company |
| 2:2020cv02499 |
| October 8, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| John W Lungstrum |
| Angel D Mitchell |
| P.I.: Other |
| 45 U.S.C. ยง 51 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
INITIAL ORDER REGARDING PLANNING AND SCHEDULING: Scheduling Conference set for 1/5/2021 at 03:30 PM in Telephone ADM - CONFERENCE LINE 1-888-363-4749 ACCESS CODE 3977627 before Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell. Rule 26 Planning Conference Deadline 12/15/2020. Report of Parties Planning Meeting deadline 12/29/2020. Rule 26 Initial Disclosures Deadline set for 12/29/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell on 11/16/2020. (ht)
|
| Filing 6 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Union Pacific Railroad Company identifying Union Pacific Corporation as corporate parent . (Lewis, Kathryn) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint by Union Pacific Railroad Company.(Lewis, Kathryn) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED -- Personal Service by Jeremy Hood upon Union Pacific Railroad Company served on 10/26/2020, answer due 11/16/2020 (Lombardo, Richard) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER granting #2 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Blake G. Arata, Jr for Jeremy Hood pursuant to D. Kan. Rule 83.5.4 for purposes of this case only. Signed by Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell on 10/26/2020. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (jal)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for attorney Blake Arata, Jr. to appear pro hac vice ( Pro hac vice fee $50, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-5298723.) by Plaintiff Jeremy Hood (referred to Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell) (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Affidavit, #2 ECF Registration Form ECF Registration)(Lombardo, Richard) |
| SUMMONS ISSUED as to Union Pacific Railroad Company. (issued to Attorney for service) (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry) (ca) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with trial location of Kansas City ( Filing fee $400, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-5282843.), filed by Jeremy Hood. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Civil Cover Sheet)(Lombardo, Richard) |
| NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to District Judge John W. Lungstrum and Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (ca) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hood v. Union Pacific Railroad Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Jeremy Hood | |
| Represented By: | Michael Barzee |
| Represented By: | Richard F. Lombardo |
| Represented By: | Blake G. Arata, Jr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Union Pacific Railroad Company | |
| Represented By: | Kathryn A. Lewis |
| Represented By: | Keith Goman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
