Robinson v. Holmes, M.D. et al
Plaintiff: Maurice Robinson
Defendant: Daniel Holmes, M.D. and Kansas City Urology Care, PA
Case Number: 2:2021cv02602
Filed: December 27, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Kansas
Presiding Judge: Daniel D Crabtree
Referring Judge: Teresa J James
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 24, 2022 Filing 8 JUDGMENT. Signed by deputy clerk on 1/24/2022. Mailed to pro se party Maurice Robinson by regular mail. (hw)
January 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by District Judge Daniel D. Crabtree on 1/24/2022. Mailed to pro se party Maurice Robinson by regular mail. (hw)
January 18, 2022 Filing 6 RESPONSE re #5 Order to Show Cause, by Plaintiff Maurice Robinson.(ca)
January 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Plaintiff must show good cause in writing to District Judge Daniel D. Crabtree, on or before January 31, 2022, why the Court should not dismiss this action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Signed by Magistrate Judge Teresa J. James on 1/10/22. Mailed to pro se party Maurice Robinson by regular mail. (ct)
January 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, but the U.S. Marshals Service is directed to withhold service of summons and the complaint pending further order of the Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Teresa J. James on 1/6/22. Mailed to pro se party Maurice Robinson by regular mail. (ct)
December 27, 2021 Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Maurice Robinson. NOTE - Access to document is restricted pursuant to the courts privacy policy. (referred to Magistrate Judge Teresa J. James) (Attachments: #1 Affidavit) (lb)
December 27, 2021 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET re #1 Complaint by Plaintiff Maurice Robinson. (lb)
December 27, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with trial location of Kansas City, filed by Maurice Robinson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (lb)
December 27, 2021 NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to District Judge Daniel D. Crabtree and Magistrate Judge Teresa J. James for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (lb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Robinson v. Holmes, M.D. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Maurice Robinson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Daniel Holmes, M.D.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kansas City Urology Care, PA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?