AVD Bellmont LLC v. Lowe et al
AVD Bellmont LLC |
Daniel H. Lowe, Legacy Venture West II, LLC, Venture West II, LC, Legacy Shawnee, LLC, Venture West Development, LLC, Legacy OC, LLC, Venture West III Development, L.L.C., Venture West Development III, LLC, Richard B Katz, Sandberg Phoenix von Gontard P.C., The Katz Law Firm, L.C., Daniel Lowe, Richard B. Katz, Sandberg Phoenix & von Gontard, P.C., Katz Law Firm, L.C. The, Lynn E. Russell and Russell Law Offices, LLC |
2:2022cv02153 |
April 22, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Kansas |
Kenneth G Gale |
Kathryn H Vratil |
Securities/Commodities |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED -- Personal by AVD Bellmont LLC upon Venture West II, LC served on 5/14/2022, answer due 6/6/2022 (Murphy, Mark) |
Filing 10 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED -- Personal by AVD Bellmont LLC upon Venture West Development III, LLC served on 5/14/2022, answer due 6/6/2022 (Murphy, Mark) |
Filing 9 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED -- Personal by AVD Bellmont LLC upon Venture West Development, LLC served on 5/14/2022, answer due 6/6/2022 (Murphy, Mark) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED -- Personal by AVD Bellmont LLC upon Legacy Venture West II, LLC served on 5/14/2022, answer due 6/6/2022 (Murphy, Mark) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED -- Personal by AVD Bellmont LLC upon Legacy Shawnee, LLC served on 5/14/2022, answer due 6/6/2022 (Murphy, Mark) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED -- Personal by AVD Bellmont LLC upon Venture West III Development, L.L.C. served on 5/14/2022, answer due 6/6/2022 (Murphy, Mark) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED -- Personal by AVD Bellmont LLC upon Legacy OC, LLC served on 5/14/2022, answer due 6/6/2022 (Murphy, Mark) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED -- Personal by AVD Bellmont LLC upon Daniel Lowe served on 5/14/2022, answer due 6/6/2022 (Murphy, Mark) |
Filing 3 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by AVD Bellmont LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-Purchase Agreement, #2 Exhibit 2-First Amendment, #3 Exhibit 3-Second Amendment, #4 Exhibit 4-Demand Letter, #5 Exhibit 5-Membership Interest Purchase Agreement)(Murphy, Mark) |
SUMMONS ISSUED as to Lynn E. Russell, Russell Law Offices, LLC. (issued to Attorney for service) (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry) (lb) |
SUMMONS ISSUED as to Richard B. Katz, Katz Law Firm, L.C. The, Legacy OC, LLC, Legacy Shawnee, LLC, Legacy Venture West II, LLC, Daniel Lowe, Sandberg Phoenix & von Gontard, P.C., Venture West Development III, LLC, Venture West Development, LLC, Venture West II, LC, Venture West III Development, L.L.C. (issued to Attorney for service) (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry) (lb) |
NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to District Judge Kathryn H. Vratil and Magistrate Judge Kenneth G. Gale for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (lb) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Plaintiff AVD Bellmont LLC. (Murphy, Mark) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with trial location of Kansas City ( Filing fee $402, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-5764488.), filed by AVD Bellmont LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Redacted Exhibit 5)(Murphy, Mark) Modified on 4/25/2022 to remove repeated words (ca). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.