Warner v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
John David Warner |
Kilolo Kijakazi and Social Security Administration, Commissioner of |
Social Security Regional Administrator |
2:2022cv02277 |
July 18, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Kansas |
Eric F Melgren |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Summons Returned Executed Summons served on United States Attorney General. (Driskill, Roger) |
Filing 4 Summons Returned Executed Summons served on Office of the Regional Counsel. (Driskill, Roger) |
Filing 3 Summons Returned Executed Social Security Administration, Commissioner of served on 7/25/2022, answer due 9/23/2022. Summons served on United States Attorney. (Driskill, Roger) |
SUMMONS ISSUED as to Social Security Administration, Commissioner of, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (issued to Attorney for service) (jsh) |
NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to Chief District Judge Eric F. Melgren for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (jsh) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Plaintiff John David Warner. (Wehner, Andrea) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with trial location of Kansas City ( Filing fee $402, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-5825910.), filed by John David Warner.(Wehner, Andrea) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.