Roberts et al v. Caskey et al
| Katie Roberts, Rosemary Walker, Thad Snider, Stacie Harvey, Hannah Mingucci and Melissa Leavitt |
| Bryan Caskey, Scott Schwab, Derek Schmidt and Laura Kelly |
| 2:2022cv02366 |
| September 15, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| John W Broomes |
| Daniel D Crabtree |
| Angel D Mitchell |
| Civil Rights: Voting |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 2
CIVIL COVER SHEET re #1 Complaint by Plaintiffs Stacie Harvey, Melissa Leavitt, Hannah Mingucci, Katie Roberts, Thad Snider, Rosemary Walker. (jk)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT (titled Verified Petition for Writ of Mandamus) with trial location of Kansas City, filed by Melissa Leavitt, Thad Snider, Rosemary Walker, Stacie Harvey, Katie Roberts, Hannah Mingucci. (jk)
|
|
NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY - Designation of place of trial is missing. The filing party/attorney is directed to correct the deficiency immediately. Mailed to pro se Plaintiffs Katie Roberts, Rosemary Walker, Thad Snider, Stacie Harvey, Hannah Mingucci, and Melissa Leavitt by regular mail. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (jk)
|
|
FILING FEE PAID by Katie Roberts: in the amount of $402, receipt number #600000209. (jk)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
