LaRue v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
| Miranda LaRue |
| Social Security Administration, Commissioner of |
| Social Security Regional Administrator and Social Security Administration - Office of General Counsel |
| 2:2023cv02023 |
| January 20, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| John W Lungstrum |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD - Certified copy of transcript of record by Defendant Social Security Administration, Commissioner of. Initial Brief due by 4/17/2023. (Attachments: #1 001 Certification Page, #2 002 Court Transcript Index, #3 003 Administrative documents and oral hearing transcript (Pages 1 - 59), #4 004 Payment documents and decisions (Pages 60 - 90), #5 005 Jurisdictional documents and notices (Pages 91 - 162), #6 006 Non disability related development (Pages 163 - 180), #7 007 Disability related development (Pages 181 - 290), #8 008 Medical Records (Pages 291 - 456), #9 009 Medical Records (Pages 457 - 459), #10 010 Medical Records (Pages 460 - 461), #11 011 Medical Records (Pages 462 - 601))(Johnson, Victoria) |
| Filing 7 (DISREGARD - DUPLICATE FILING OF DE # 2) CIVIL COVER SHEET by Plaintiff Miranda LaRue. (Wehner, Andrea) Modified on 1/25/2023 (kao). |
| Filing 6 (DISREGARD - DUPLICATE FILING OF DE # 1) COMPLAINT - SOCIAL SECURITY with trial location of Kansas City. ( Filing fee $402, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-5968226.) Pursuant to Rule 3 of the Fed. R. Civ. P. Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions, the Notice of Electronic Filing for this Complaint has been transmitted to the U.S. Attorney for the District of Kansas, as well as the Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel, filed by Miranda LaRue.(Wehner, Andrea) Modified on 1/25/2023 (kao). |
| DOCKET ANNOTATION: Disregard documents #6 Complaint - Social Security and #7 Civil Cover Sheet which are duplicates of docket entries #1 and #2 ; documents were refiled in error during the process of paying the filing fee. (kao) |
Filing 5
ORDER denying #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis.. Signed by District Judge John W. Lungstrum on January 23, 2023. (Attachments: #1 Dist. of KS Affidavit of Financial Status) (aeq)
|
| Filing 4 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE by Victoria Vina Johnson on behalf of Social Security Administration, Commissioner of (Johnson, Victoria) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Miranda LaRue. NOTE - Access to document is restricted pursuant to the courts privacy policy. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Financial Status) (Sciolaro, Kyle) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Plaintiff Miranda LaRue. (Sciolaro, Kyle) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT - SOCIAL SECURITY with trial location of Kansas City. Pursuant to Rule 3 of the Fed. R. Civ. P. Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions, the Notice of Electronic Filing for this Complaint has been transmitted to the U.S. Attorney for the District of Kansas, as well as the Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel, filed by Miranda LaRue. (Sciolaro, Kyle) |
| NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to District Judge John W. Lungstrum for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (jsh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
