Dyke Industries Inc. v. American Direct Procurement, Inc.
Dyke Industries Inc. |
American Direct Procurement, Inc. doing business as American Direct |
2:2023cv02295 |
July 3, 2023 |
U.S. District Court for the District of Kansas |
Rachel E Schwartz |
Holly L Teeter |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 Letter to the Johnson County District Court regarding the remand of case no. 23LA04409 (certified tracking #7020 3160 0000 9283 4977). (mls) |
![]() |
Filing 11 STIPULATION BY BOTH PARTIES FOR REMAND by American Direct Procurement, Inc.. (Webb, Danne) |
Filing 10 MOTION to Remand to State Court by Plaintiff Dyke Industries Inc. (Hesse, Scott) |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 7 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by American Direct Procurement, Inc. identifying None as corporate parent (Webb, Danne) |
Filing 6 First Amended ANSWER to Complaint by American Direct Procurement, Inc..(Webb, Danne) |
Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint and Affirmative Defenses by American Direct Procurement, Inc..(Webb, Danne) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED upon American Direct Procurement, Inc. Personal Service by Johnson County Sheriff on 6/13/2023 (ORIGINALLY FILED IN JOHNSON COUNTY DISTRICT COURT ON 6/13/2023) (sz) |
Filing 3 DESIGNATION OF PLACE OF TRIAL filed by Defendant American Direct Procurement, Inc. - trial to be held in Kansas City. (Webb, Danne) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Defendant American Direct Procurement, Inc. (Webb, Danne) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Johnson, case number 23LA04409, trial location of Kansas City (Filing fee $402, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-6097343.), filed by American Direct Procurement, Inc. (Attachments: #1 State Court Records Petition, Summons and Sheriff's Return of Civil Process)(Webb, Danne) |
NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to District Judge Holly L. Teeter and Magistrate Judge Rachel E. Schwartz for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) NOTICE OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE AVAILABILITY: A United States magistrate judge is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action if all parties voluntarily consent. Information & consent forms are available at http://www.uscourts.gov/forms/civil-forms/notice-consent-and-reference-civil-action-magistrate-judge (nao) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Dyke Industries Inc. v. American Direct Procurement, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Dyke Industries Inc. | |
Represented By: | William Scott Hesse |
Represented By: | Scott Hesse |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: American Direct Procurement, Inc. doing business as American Direct | |
Represented By: | Danne Wayne Webb |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.