Tom & Jerry, Inc. v. Mullis Business Technologies, LLC
Tom & Jerry, Inc. |
Mullis Business Technologies, LLC |
Tom & Jerry, Inc. |
Mullis Business Technologies, LLC |
2:2024cv02254 |
June 14, 2024 |
U.S. District Court for the District of Kansas |
Gwynne E Birzer |
Kathryn H Vratil |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Declaratory Judgemen |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 24, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION by Counter Claimant Mullis Business Technologies, LLC, Defendant Mullis Business Technologies, LLC re #13 MOTION to Remand to State Court (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Declaration of Robert Mullis)(Suhr, Jeremy) |
Filing 16 ANSWER to #10 Answer to Complaint, Counterclaim by Tom & Jerry, Inc..(McFee, Linda) |
Filing 15 WITHDRAWAL OF COUNSEL by Dustin Rucinski and ENTRY OF APPEARANCE OF SUBSTITUTED COUNSEL by Linda C. McFee on behalf of Tom & Jerry, Inc. (McFee, Linda) |
Filing 14 MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT of #13 MOTION to Remand to State Court by Plaintiff Tom & Jerry, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Ex. 1 Houlehan Declaration)(McFee, Linda) |
Filing 13 MOTION to Remand to State Court by Plaintiff Tom & Jerry, Inc. (McFee, Linda) |
Filing 12 WITHDRAWAL OF COUNSEL by Thomas J. Hamilton and ENTRY OF APPEARANCE OF SUBSTITUTED COUNSEL by Linda C. McFee on behalf of All Plaintiffs (McFee, Linda) |
![]() |
Filing 10 ANSWER to Complaint , COUNTERCLAIM against Tom & Jerry, Inc. by Mullis Business Technologies, LLC.(Suhr, Jeremy) |
Filing 9 DESIGNATION OF PLACE OF TRIAL filed by Plaintiff Tom & Jerry, Inc. - trial to be held in Kansas City. (Rucinski, Dustin) |
Filing 8 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Tom & Jerry, Inc. identifying None as corporate parent (Rucinski, Dustin) |
Filing 7 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE by Dustin Rucinski on behalf of Tom & Jerry, Inc. (Rucinski, Dustin) |
Filing 6 CLERKS ORDER EXTENDING TIME until 7/5/2024 for Defendant Mullis Business Technologies, LLC to answer or otherwise plead. Signed by deputy clerk on 6/21/2024. (nac) |
Filing 5 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Mullis Business Technologies, LLC identifying None as corporate parent . (Suhr, Jeremy) |
Filing 4 STATE COURT RECORDS from District Court of Wyandotte County, Kansas. (Suhr, Jeremy) |
Filing 3 DESIGNATION OF PLACE OF TRIAL filed by Defendant Mullis Business Technologies, LLC - trial to be held in Kansas City. (Suhr, Jeremy) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Defendant Mullis Business Technologies, LLC. (Suhr, Jeremy) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from District Court of Wyandotte County, case number WY-2024-CV-000378 Trial location of Kansas City ( Filing fee $405, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-6382234.), filed by Mullis Business Technologies, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Petition, #2 Exhibit B - State Court Notice of Removal) (Suhr, Jeremy) |
NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to District Judge Kathryn H. Vratil and Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) NOTICE OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE AVAILABILITY: A United States magistrate judge is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action if all parties voluntarily consent. Information & consent forms are available at http://www.uscourts.gov/forms/civil-forms/notice-consent-and-reference-civil-action-magistrate-judge (jsh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.