Water for Commerce Fund Management, LLC v. Refreshing USA, LLC et al
| Water for Commerce Fund Management, LLC |
| Refreshing Las Vegas, LLC, Refreshing New Mexico, LLC, Refreshing Georgia, LLC, Valley Vending, LLC, Refreshing California, LLC, Refreshing Carolinas, LLC, Vendpro LLC, Refreshing Texas, LLC, Refreshing Great Lakes, LLC d/b/a Commercial Vend IL, Refreshing DC, LLC, Refreshing USA, LLC, Refreshing Washington, LLC, Refreshing Florida, LLC, Refreshing Colorado, LLC, Refreshing Arizona, LLC and Refreshing New England, LLC |
| 2:2024cv02368 |
| August 19, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 DESIGNATION OF PLACE OF TRIAL filed by Plaintiff Water for Commerce Fund Management, LLC - trial to be held in Kansas City. (Easley, William) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Plaintiff Water for Commerce Fund Management, LLC. (Easley, William) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with trial location of Kansas City ( Filing fee $405, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-6445716.), filed by Water for Commerce Fund Management, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G)(Easley, William) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
