Cremer et al v. Conover et al
Anthony Cremer and Steven R. Burton |
Emmalee Conover and Roger Werholtz |
5:2009cv03200 |
September 22, 2009 |
US District Court for the District of Kansas |
Topeka Office |
Cowley |
Sam A. Crow |
None |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiff is granted twenty (20) days to supplement his motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis by submitting the certified financial records required under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). Plaintiff is granted twenty (20) days to sh ow cause why this action should not be construed as a habeas corpus action filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, and dismissed without prejudice based upon plaintiffs failure to exhaust state court remedies. 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Steven R. Burton is moot. Signed by Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 10/15/09.(mb) |
Filing 4 ORDER ENTERED: This action brought by two prisoner plaintiffs is severed such that each prisoner proceeds as the sole plaintiff in their respective case. The clerk's office is directed to open a new case with Mr. Burton as the sole plaintiff, to copy all pleadings signed by Mr. Burton in the instant case, and to place said copied pleadings into Mr. Burton's case. Signed by Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 10/01/09. (smnd) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.