Kinney v. Holder et al
| Darryl Kinney |
| Janene Falley, Thomas Shell, Scott Matthewson, Robert S. Mueller, III, Barry R. Grissom, Michael Miller, Gary Smith, Eric J. Holder and Leon Panetta |
| 5:2011cv04176 |
| November 29, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Topeka Office |
| Shawnee |
| J. Thomas Marten |
| James P. O'Hara |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
37
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 34 plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by District Judge J. Thomas Marten on 5/23/2012. Mailed to pro se party Darryl Kinney by regular mail. (mss)
|
|
Filing
32
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying as moot 10 Janene Falley's Motion to Dismiss Party; denying as moot 10 Janene Falley's Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; denying as moot 10 Janene Falley's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; denying 16 plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment; granting 22 defendant's Motion to Dismiss Party; granting 22 defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; granting 22 defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; granting 24 defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; granting 24 defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; and denying 26 plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment. Signed by District Judge J. Thomas Marten on 4/4/2012.Mailed to pro se party Darryl Kinney by regular mail. (mss)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
