Kelly v. Judge Advocate General of the Navy et al
| Detric A. Kelly |
| FNU LNU (1), Robert E. Treuting, Pat Brown, Louis D. Hunt, Jr., Judge Advocate General of the Navy and FNU LNU (2) |
| 5:2012cv03067 |
| March 19, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Topeka Office |
| Leavenworth |
| Sam A. Crow |
| Prison Condition |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 552 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
10
ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiff's motion 2 for leave to proceed without prepayment of fees is granted. This action is dismissed without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction. Signed by Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 12/18/2012. (Mailed to pro se party Detric A. Kelly by regular mail.) (smnd)
|
|
Filing
6
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiff is granted twenty (20) days in which to submit to the court an initial partial filing fee of $22.50. Any objection to this order must be filed on or before the date payment is due. The failure to pay th e fees as required herein may result in dismissal of this action without prejudice. Within the same twenty-day period, plaintiff is required to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for failure to state a claim for relief in federal court under FOIA. Signed by Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 6/4/2012. (Mailed to pro se party Detric A. Kelly by regular mail.) (smnd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
