Perry v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
Jason L. Perry |
Federal Bureau of Prisons, John Loftness, J. Grissom and (fnu) Reyes |
5:2012cv03100 |
April 23, 2012 |
US District Court for the District of Kansas |
Topeka Office |
Leavenworth |
Sam A. Crow |
Prison Condition |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ENTERED: This matter is dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff's motion 3 for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. Signed by Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 8/7/2012. (Mailed to pro se party Jason L. Perry by regular mail.) (smnd) |
Filing 6 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiff shall supply the court on or before August 3, 2012, with a certified copy of his institutional financial records for the six months preceding May 2012 from all facilities in which he was housed during that per iod. The failure to file a timely response may result in the dismissal of this action without prejudice and without further notice to plaintiff. On or before August 3, 2012, plaintiff shall advise the court whether he submitted an administrative to rt claim to the Bureau of Prions before commencing this action under the Federal Tort Claims Act and also shall advise the court whether he intends to pursue further relief in this matter under Bivens. Signed by Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 7/11/2012. (Mailed to pro se party Jason L. Perry by regular mail.) (smnd) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.