Wunder v. Elettric 80, Inc.

Plaintiff: Joann Wunder
Defendant: Elettric 80, Inc.
Case Number: 5:2013cv04014
Filed: February 15, 2013
Court: Kansas District Court
Office: Topeka Office
County: Shawnee
Presiding Judge: Sam A. Crow
Referring Judge: K. Gary Sebelius
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
August 15, 2014 84 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 42 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 58 Motion for Hearing. Signed by Magistrate Judge K. Gary Sebelius on 8/15/2014. (mrb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wunder v. Elettric 80, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joann Wunder
Represented By: Roger D. Fincher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Elettric 80, Inc.
Represented By: Alfred E. Koehler, III
Represented By: David E. Kawala
Represented By: Megan E. Schneider
Represented By: Cynthia J. Sheppeard
Represented By: Wesley A. Weathers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?