Keys et al v. Obama et al
| Barbara K. Keys and Shawn Keys |
| Barack Obama, Chuck Hagel, John Brennan and James Clapper |
| 5:2013cv04103 |
| September 5, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Topeka Office |
| Dickinson |
| Eric F. Melgren |
| James P. O'Hara |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
25
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 19 Motion for Reconsideration ; denying 19 Motion to Reopen Case; denying 23 Motion to Set Aside ; denying 24 Motion for Order. Signed by District Judge Eric F. Melgren on 2/11/2015.Mailed to pro se party Shawn Keys by regular mail (cm)
|
|
Filing
17
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying as moot 4 Motion for TRO; granting 6 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Signed by District Judge Eric F. Melgren on 3/5/14. Mailed to pro se parties Barbara K. Keys and Shawn Keys by regular mail. (alm)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER granting 10 defendants' motion to stay discovery pending the district court's ruling on defendants' motion to dismiss. Within seven days of a ruling on their motion to dismiss, defendants shall notify the undersigned of the ruling by sending an e-mail to the undersigned's chambers. Signed by Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara on 12/2/2013. Mailed to pro se party Shawn Keys, 1761 S. 2800 Road, Herington, KS 67449 by regular and certified mail. (mb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
