Edminster v. Dedeke et al
5:2016cv03176 |
August 18, 2016 |
US District Court for the District of Kansas |
Topeka Office |
Sam A. Crow |
David J. Waxse |
Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 52 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ENTERED: Defendants Advanced Correctional Healthcare and Melissa Wardrop's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 41 is granted. Defendant "Doctor Bob" is dismissed from the action. This case is closed. Signed by District Judge Carlos Murguia on 04/18/18. Mailed to pro se party David Bently Edminster by regular mail. (smnd) |
Filing 50 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ENTERED: Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 39 is granted. Signed by District Judge Carlos Murguia on 01/26/18. Mailed to pro se party David Bently Edminster by regular mail. (smnd) |
Filing 48 ORDER denying 46 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge K. Gary Sebelius on 10/19/2017. Mailed to pro se party plaintiff David B. Edminster by regular mail.(wh) |
Filing 44 ORDER denying 35 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge K. Gary Sebelius on 10/12/2017. Mailed to pro se party plaintiff David B. Edminster by regular mail. (wh) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Edminster v. Dedeke et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.