Solton v. Geary County
Plaintiff: Carlton Solton, Jr.
Defendant: Geary County
Case Number: 5:2016cv03236
Filed: November 21, 2016
Court: US District Court for the District of Kansas
Office: Topeka Office
County: Geary
Presiding Judge: Sam A. Crow
Presiding Judge: David J. Waxse
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 22, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: This matter is liberally construed as a petition for habeas corpus brought under 28 U.S.C. §2241 and is dismissed without prejudice. 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is granted. Signed by U.S. District Senior Judge Sam A. Crow on 12/22/16. Mailed to pro se party Carlton Wayne Solton by regular mail. (msb)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Solton v. Geary County
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Carlton Solton, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Geary County
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?