Ali v. English
Petitioner: Falasha Ali
Respondent: Nicole English
Case Number: 5:2016cv03258
Filed: December 29, 2016
Court: US District Court for the District of Kansas
Office: Topeka Office
County: Leavenworth
Presiding Judge: John W. Lungstrum
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 3, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE ENTERED: Respondent is required to show cause on or before January 30, 2017 why the writ should not be granted. Petitioner has until March 2, 2017 to file a traverse thereto. Signed by District Judge John W. Lungstrum on 01/03/17. Mailed to pro se party Falasha Ali by regular mail; e-mailed to U.S. Attorney for the District of Kansas. (smnd)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ali v. English
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Falasha Ali
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Nicole English
Represented By: Jackie A. Rapstine
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?