Weber v. Osage County Board of Commissioners
Plaintiff: Sharon Weber
Defendant: Osage County Board of Commissioners
Case Number: 5:2016cv04186
Filed: December 19, 2016
Court: US District Court for the District of Kansas
Office: Topeka Office
County: Osage
Presiding Judge: Sam A. Crow
Presiding Judge: K. Gary Sebelius
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 6, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 13 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 7 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Signed by U.S. District Senior Judge Sam A. Crow on 3/6/17. (msb)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Weber v. Osage County Board of Commissioners
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Osage County Board of Commissioners
Represented By: Vaughn Burkholder
Represented By: Wendell F. Cowan, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sharon Weber
Represented By: Arthur A. Glassman
Represented By: Stephen Douglas Lanterman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?