Davis (ID 71960) v. Heimgartner et al
| Peter J. Davis |
| James Heimgartner and Attorney General of Kansas |
| 5:2017cv03110 |
| July 5, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Topeka Office |
| Butler |
| Sam A. Crow |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
16
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE ENTERED: The stay in this matter is lifted, and petitioner is granted to and including November 8, 2021, to show cause why this matter should not be dismissed as time-barred. Signed by U.S. Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 10/6/2021. Mailed to pro se party Peter J. Davis by regular mail. (jal)
|
|
Filing
13
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ENTERED: Petitioner's motions to alter or amend and to stay this matter 6 & 10 are granted. Respondent's motion to dismiss 9 is denied. This matter is stayed subject to further order of the Court and petitioner is ordered to file a status report on or before October 22, 2018. Signed by U.S. Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 08/22/18. Mailed to pro se party Peter J. Davis by regular mail. (smnd)
|
|
Filing
8
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ENTERED: Respondent's motion 7 for an extension to file a responsive pleading is granted to and including February 26, 2018. Signed by U.S. Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 12/15/17. Mailed to pro se party Peter Davis by regular mail. (smnd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
