Loggins (ID 63088) et al v. Norwood et al
Plaintiff: Kevin D. Loggins and Elizabeth M. Wilson
Defendant: Joseph Norwood, Dan Schnurr, Shannon Meyer and (fnu) Doe
Case Number: 5:2018cv03016
Filed: January 25, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Kansas
Office: Topeka Office
County: Reno
Presiding Judge: Sam A. Crow
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 79 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration (Doc. 74 ) is denied. Plaintiff must pay the remainder of his $505 appellate filing fee to the Clerk of U.S. District Court if he wishes to proceed with his appeal, consistent with the court's March 12, 2020 Order. Signed by District Judge Daniel D. Crabtree on 03/30/20. Mailed to pro se party Kevin D. Loggins, Sr. by regular mail. (smnd)
March 12, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 72 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ENTERED: Defendants' Motion for Reconsideration (Doc. 70 ) is granted. The court's March 4, 2020 Memorandum and Order (Doc. 69 ) is vacated. Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis (Doc. 67 ) is denied. Signed by District Judge Daniel D. Crabtree on 03/12/20. Mailed to pro se party Kevin D. Loggins, Sr. by regular mail. (smnd)
January 15, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 61 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ENTERED: Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, or alternatively, for Summary Judgment (Doc. 43 ) is granted. Defendants' Motion to Stay Discovery (Doc. 45 ) and plaintiff's Motion to Recuse (Doc. 38 ) are denied as m oot. Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration (Doc. 41 ), Motion for Correction of Judicial Notice and Request for Leave (Doc. 58 ), and Motion for Joinder (Doc. 59 ) are denied. Signed by District Judge Daniel D. Crabtree on 01/15/20. Mailed to pro se party Kevin D. Loggins, Sr. by regular mail. (smnd)
March 6, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER ENTERED: Defendants' Motion for Extension of Time 32 is granted. Defendants Joseph Norwood, Shannon Meyer and Dan Schnurr shall answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by April 3, 2019. Plaintiff's Motion to Chan ge Venue 28 is denied without prejudice. Plaintiff's Motion to Impeach the Judgment of Conviction for the Charge of Aggravated Sexual Battery in Case No. 95CR1859 29 is denied. Plaintiff's Motion to Consolidate 30 is denied. Signed by U.S. Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 03/06/19. Mailed to pro se party Kevin D. Loggins, Sr. by regular mail. (smnd)
November 14, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiff Elizabeth Wilson should show cause by November 28, 2018, why she should not be dismissed as a plaintiff and why the claims regarding the recognition of her marital status to Plaintiff Loggins and interference with spousal co mmunication should not be voluntarily dismissed as set forth in the Notice of Voluntary Dismissal at Doc. 17 . The KDOC is not required to address the marriage/spousal communication issue in the Martinez report ordered at Doc. 11 . Any request for the undersigned to recuse is denied. Plaintiff's Motion to Consolidate 16 is denied without prejudice. Signed by U.S. Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 11/14/18. Mailed to pro se party plaintiffs by regular mail. (smnd)
April 25, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiffs' Motion to Amend Complaint 6 is granted. Plaintiffs are granted until May 25, 2018, in which to file a complete and proper amended complaint. Signed by U.S. Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 04/25/18. Mailed to pro se party Kevin D. Loggins and Elizabeth M. Wilson by regular mail. (smnd)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Loggins (ID 63088) et al v. Norwood et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kevin D. Loggins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Elizabeth M. Wilson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Joseph Norwood
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dan Schnurr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Shannon Meyer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: (fnu) Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?