Dixon v. Core Civic et al
Plaintiff: Dijon T. Dixon
Defendant: Core Civic and L. R. Thomas
Case Number: 5:2019cv03028
Filed: February 27, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Kansas
Presiding Judge: Sam A Crow
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 8, 2019 INITIAL PARTIAL FILING FEE PAID on 4/8/2019. Receipt number T4631012729, in the amount of $ 4.50. (mls)
April 1, 2019 Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time to Submit the Filing Fee by Plaintiff Dijon T. Dixon (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (smnd)
March 22, 2019 Filing 6 NOTICE of Release of Funds Authorization by Plaintiff Dijon T. Dixon re 5 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (smnd)
March 14, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis #2 is granted. The Court assesses an initial partial filing fee of $4.50, calculated under 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(1). Plaintiff is granted fourteen (14) days from receipt of this order to submit the fee. Any objection to this order must be filed on or before the date payment is due. The failure to pay the fee as directed may result in the dismissal of this matter without further notice. Plaintiff remains obligated to pay the remainder of the $350.00 filing fee. The agency having custody of plaintiff shall forward payments from plaintiff's account in installments calculated under 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(2). The clerk is to transmit a copy of this order to plaintiff, to the finance office at the institution where plaintiff is currently confined, and to the court's finance office. Entered by U.S. Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 03/14/19. Mailed to pro se party Dijon T. Dixon by regular mail. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (smnd)
March 11, 2019 Filing 4 INMATE ACCOUNT SUMMARY in Support of #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Dijon T. Dixon (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (smnd)
February 27, 2019 Filing 3 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY re #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis mailed to pro se party Dijon T. Dixon by regular mail. Response deadline 3/29/2019. (smnd)
February 27, 2019 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Dijon T. Dixon (Attachments: #1 Commissary Summary) (smnd)
February 27, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Dijon T. Dixon (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (smnd)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dixon v. Core Civic et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Core Civic
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: L. R. Thomas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dijon T. Dixon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?