Roberts v. Peck et al
Plaintiff: Robert Fitzsgerald Roberts, Sr.
Defendant: Roger Soldan, Angela Finch, Stan Fruits, Angela Peck, Matthew Nelson and Benjamin McManigal
Interested Party: Saline County Sheriff's Office
Case Number: 5:2019cv03161
Filed: August 26, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Kansas
Presiding Judge: Sam A Crow
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition)
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 17, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel Doc. No. #5 is denied without prejudice to plaintiff renewing the request at a later time. Signed by U.S. District Senior Judge Sam A. Crow on 9/17/2019. Mailed to pro se party Robert Fitzsgerald Roberts, Sr. by regular mail. (jal)
September 11, 2019 Filing 5 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Plaintiff Robert Fitzsgerald Roberts, Sr. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (jal)
September 4, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER ENTERED: The Clerk of Court shall provide the Sheriff of Saline County with a copy of the Complaint and this order for use in preparing the Martinez report. The report required herein shall be filed no later than sixty (60) days from the date of this order, unless the time is extended by the Court. The Clerk of Court shall enter the Saline County Sheriff's Office as an interested party on the docket for the limited purpose of preparing the Martinez report. Upon the filing of that report, the Saline County Sheriff's Office may move for termination from this action. Signed by U.S. District Senior Judge Sam A. Crow on 09/04/19. Mailed to pro se party Robert Fitzsjerald Roberts, Sr. by regular mail. (smnd)
August 29, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed without prepayment of fees #2 is granted because plaintiff's trust fund account statement shows that he has insufficient funds to pay an initial partial filing fee. Notwithstanding this grant of leave, plaintiff is required to pay the full amount of the filing fee and is hereby assessed $350.00. Plaintiff is required to make monthly payments of 20 percent of the preceding month's income credited to the prisoner's account. The agency having custody of plaintiff shall forward payments from the prisoner's account to the clerk of the court each time the amount in the account exceeds $10.00 until the filing fees are paid. 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(2). The clerk is to transmit a copy of this order to plaintiff, to the finance office at the institution where plaintiff is currently confined, and to the court's finance office. Entered by U.S. Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 08/29/19. Mailed to pro se party Robert Fitzsgerald Roberts, Sr. by regular mail. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (smnd)
August 26, 2019 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Robert Fitzsgerald Roberts, Sr. (Attachments: #1 Inmate Account History) (smnd)
August 26, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Robert Fitzsgerald Roberts, Sr. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (smnd)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Roberts v. Peck et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Roger Soldan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Angela Finch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Stan Fruits
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Angela Peck
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Matthew Nelson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Benjamin McManigal
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert Fitzsgerald Roberts, Sr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Saline County Sheriff's Office
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?