Davis v. Berg et al
| Darren Jarelle Davis |
| (fnu) Taylor, (fnu) Berg and (fnu) Ramirez |
| Johnson County Sheriff |
| 5:2020cv03021 |
| January 15, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Sam A Crow |
| Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Johnson County Kansas Sheriff's Return of Civil Process. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (smnd) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS by Plaintiff Darren Jarelle Davis. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (jal) |
| Filing 8 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiff's Motion for Appointment of Counsel (Doc. #7 ) is denied without prejudice. The clerk of the court shall prepare a waiver of service form for Defendants pursuant to Rule 4(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, to be served upon Defendants at no cost to Plaintiff. The Clerk of Court shall enter the Johnson County Sheriff as an interested party on the docket for the limited purpose of preparing the Martinez Report. Upon the filing of that report, the Sheriff may move for termination from this action. Signed by U.S. Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 2/21/2020. Mailed to pro se party Darren Jarelle Davis, the Defendants, the Johnson County Attorney and the Johnson County Sheriff by regular mail. (jal) |
| WAIVER OF SERVICE OF SUMMONS ISSUED as to Defendants (fnu) Berg, (fnu) Ramirez, and (fnu) Taylor. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (jal) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Plaintiff Darren Jarelle Davis. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope) (jal) |
| Filing 6 REQUEST for Issuance of Summons by Plaintiff Darren Jarelle Davis. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (jal) |
Filing 5
ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed without prepayment of fees #2 is granted because plaintiff's trust fund account statement shows that he has insufficient funds to pay an initial partial filing fee. Notwithstanding this grant of leave, plaintiff is required to pay the full amount of the filing fee and is hereby assessed $350.00. Plaintiff is required to make monthly payments of 20 percent of the preceding month's income credited to the prisoner's account. The agency having custody of plaintiff shall forward payments from the prisoner's account to the clerk of the court each time the amount in the account exceeds $10.00 until the filing fees are paid. 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(2). The clerk is to transmit a copy of this order to plaintiff, to the finance office at the institution where plaintiff is currently confined, and to the court's finance office. Entered by U.S. Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 01/21/20. Mailed to pro se party Darren Jarelle Davis by regular mail. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (smnd)
|
| Filing 4 SUPPLEMENT to #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Darren Jarelle Davis. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (smnd) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY re #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Mailed to pro se party Darren Jarelle Davis by regular mail. Response deadline 2/14/2020. (jal) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Darren Jarelle Davis. (jal) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Darren Jarelle Davis. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (jal) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
