Sutton v. Sledd et al
| Kyle J. Sutton |
| James Spies, Sara Toms, Bryanna Hanschu, Wyandotte County Courthouse, Wyandotte County Sheriff's Department, Donald Ash, (fnu) Terazza, A. M., Jacob Sledd, (fnu) (lnu), Unified Government of Wyandotte County, Kansas City, Kansas Police Department, Darrell L. Smith and Wyandotte County District Attorney's Office |
| 5:2020cv03105 |
| April 8, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Sam A Crow |
| Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 SUBPOENA EXHIBITS AFFIDAVIT by Plaintiff Kyle J. Sutton. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (smnd) |
| Filing 14 AFFIDAVIT by Plaintiff Kyle J. Sutton. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (smnd) |
| Filing 13 MOTION to Show Interference of Court Process by Plaintiff Kyle J. Sutton. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits, #2 Envelope) (smnd) |
| Filing 12 MOTION for Access to a Law Library by Plaintiff Kyle J. Sutton. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (smnd) |
| Filing 11 DUE PROCESS AND BLOCKED ACCESS TO THE COURTS COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Kyle J. Sutton. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope) (smnd) |
| Filing 10 DECLARATION by Plaintiff Kyle J. Sutton. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits A-C, #2 Envelope) (smnd) |
| Filing 9 WYANDOTTE COUNTY RETALIATION COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Kyle J. Sutton. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits, #2 Envelope) (smnd) |
| Filing 8 EXHIBIT IN SUPPORT of #1 Complaint by Plaintiff Kyle J. Sutton. (Attachments: #1 Envelopes) (smnd) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Amend Relief on #1 Complaint by Plaintiff Kyle J. Sutton. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (smnd) |
Filing 6
ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed without prepayment of fees #2 is granted because plaintiff's trust fund account statement shows that he has insufficient funds to pay an initial partial filing fee. Notwithstanding this grant of leave, plaintiff is required to pay the full amount of the filing fee and is hereby assessed $350.00. Plaintiff is required to make monthly payments of 20 percent of the preceding month's income credited to the prisoner's account. The agency having custody of plaintiff shall forward payments from the prisoner's account to the clerk of the court each time the amount in the account exceeds $10.00 until the filing fees are paid. 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(2). The clerk is to transmit a copy of this order to plaintiff, to the finance office at the institution where plaintiff is currently confined, and to the court's finance office. Entered by U.S. Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 04/22/20. Mailed to pro se party Kyle J. Sutton by regular mail. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (smnd)
|
| Filing 5 SUPPLEMENT to #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Kyle J. Sutton. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (smnd) |
| Filing 4 EXHIBITS IN SUPPORT of #1 Complaint by Plaintiff Kyle J. Sutton. (Attachments: #1 Envelopes) (smnd) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY re #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis mailed to pro se party Kyle J. Sutton by regular mail. Response deadline 5/8/2020. (smnd) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Kyle J. Sutton. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits, #2 Envelope) (smnd) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Kyle J. Sutton. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits, #2 Letter to Judge Sam Crow, #3 Envelopes) (smnd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
