Rigney (ID 118655) v. Trapp et al
Michael Rigney |
Christopher Trapp and Kansas Department of Corrections |
5:2020cv03106 |
April 8, 2020 |
U.S. District Court for the District of Kansas |
Sam A Crow |
Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 MOTION for Court Order of Evidence and Discovery by Plaintiff Michael Rigney. (smnd) |
INITIAL PARTIAL FILING FEE PAID on 05/08/20, Receipt Number T4631013818, in the amount of $28.50. (smnd) |
Filing 4 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Plaintiff Michael Rigney. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (smnd) |
DOCKET ANNOTATION: Notice sent to Plaintiff Michael Rigney stating he is incarcerated in a facility with mandatory electronic filing and should follow instructions available at the facility for transmitting pleadings electronically to the court. (smnd) |
![]() |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Michael Rigney. (Attachments: #1 Inmate Account Statement) (smnd) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Michael Rigney. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits, #2 Envelope) (smnd) |
DOCKET ANNOTATION: Notice sent to Plaintiff Michael Rigney stating he is incarcerated in a facility with mandatory electronic filing and should follow instructions available at the facility for transmitting pleadings electronically to the court. (smnd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.