Gilbert v. Kansas, State of et al
| Craig Ivan Gilbert |
| Kansas, State of, John Doe, Roger Soldan and Jeffrey Ebel |
| 5:2021cv03149 |
| June 22, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Sam A Crow |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 JUDGMENT regarding Memorandum and Order #5 dismissing matter without prejudice. Signed by Deputy Clerk on 07/23/21. Mailed to pro se party Craig Ivan Gilbert by regular mail. (smnd) |
| Filing 5 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ENTERED: Petitioner's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. #2 ) is denied. This matter is dismissed without prejudice. No certificate of appealability will issue. Signed by U.S. Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 07/23/21. Mailed to pro se party Craig Ivan Gilbert by regular mail. (smnd) |
| Filing 4 RESPONSE to #3 Notice of Deficiency by Petitioner Craig Ivan Gilbert. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (jal) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY mailed to pro se party Craig Ivan Gilbert by regular mail. Response deadline 7/22/2021. (smnd) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Petitioner Craig Ivan Gilbert. (smnd) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS filed by Petitioner Craig Ivan Gilbert. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (smnd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
